Re: [Trustees] Proposed Policy for Modifications to Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Simon,

I wish that is how it would work.  The most recent change of the TLP was
not following that process -- instead the Trust proposed the change and
implemented it after some delay -- and, for example, it resulted in a
change to how BSD licensed portions extracted from IETF documents that
is not consistent with common practice.

That is correct.  One of the things we learned from the discussions around
the last TLP changes, was that there was no clear process to follow when
the TLP needs to be changed.  This proposal is there to fix that.

2c does not seem restricted for non-IETF streams from the writing above.
I think it is important that the IETF is notified for issues relating to
the IETF stream.

2c says case 1c, 1c deals with all non IETF streams that the Trust manages.

(For the last point, please see Olaf's mail.)

Henk


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre          http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku
P.O.Box 10096          Singel 258         Phone: +31.20.5354414
1001 EB Amsterdam      1016 AB Amsterdam  Fax: +31.20.5354445
The Netherlands        The Netherlands    Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Belgium: an unsolvable problem, discussed in endless meetings, with no
         hope for a solution, where everybody still lives happily.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]