Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jari Arkko wrote:
However, in this case: if you have a general comment on 3932bis, please post to the Last Call thread. If you want to answer my specific question about the optional/mandatory nature of the IESG note, please respond to this thread.

So, to be clear, the question you have raised has to do with the difference between:

   "The IESG may choose to add an IESG note to an Independent
   Submission..."


and:

   "The IESG may choose to request the addition of an IESG note to an
   Independent Submission..."



Right? This has nothing to do with the text:

   "In exceptional cases, when the relationship of the document to the
   IETF standards process might be unclear..." ?



/a
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]