Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joel M. Halpern wrote:
And given that these are Independent Submissions, they aren't supposed to be subject to community review.

Given this fact, why is there pushback on the idea that we would prominently mark the documents to indicate that they have not been subjected to community review? It seems like the kind of thing that is of extreme relevance to the reader.

/a
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]