Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Joel M. Halpern wrote:
If every document needs this marking, ...


If this line of discussion needs to happen, it needs to happen on a separate
thread, because I believe it has nothing to do with the current text, proposal, or concern.

As noted, it is opening a very old -- and I believe very different -- basic concern.

The current question is about IESG Notes. We ought to restrict postings on this thread to that question.

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]