Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 6:56 AM -0700 7/6/09, Bob Braden wrote:
>This is not quite true... at least, it never used to be true. The restriction is/was that only the .txt version is normative; a .pdf version is non-normative and intended for explanatory material.

This is my understanding as well (I can't find an RFC that says one way or another, but I could have missed it). We have recent full-worked examples where the PDF for a standards-track document has valuable visual information, such as RFC 5059.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]