-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bob Hinden wrote: > Joe, > >> 1) exposing the full list to the entire community invites lobbying the >> nomcom >> >> This probably already happens to some extent, but do >> we really want to encourage this? > > It's not clear this will lead to more lobbying than we have now. I > think lobbying happens a lot now and is driven by the candidate > him/herself, or the many people who get the "secret" lists. I think it > would be more balanced if everyone knew. If everyone knew, there would be more lobbying since there would be more people participating. I doubt the direct or secret-list lobbying would wane much as a result. > > I would add that the current system gives a greater ability to comment > on candidates to the leadership (IAB/IESG/WG Chairs) because they get > the many of the "secret" nomcom candidate lists. The nomcom might get > broader feedback if the lists are open. Yes, they might, but as I pointed out that's not the only effect. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKMWUfE5f5cImnZrsRAopTAJ9LzCputw2o+RomPkDcPMpyDfAJtwCfVITj +w7oZ/qhGo3xxQ7gs0YmOFw= =7Tg8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf