Cullen Jennings wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > >> Giving to early implementers a guaranty that >> their contributions will not be forgotten is a way to counterbalance >> the time and effort spent in working on this contributions. > > Marc, I feel that it is well worth thanking anyone in the > acknowledgements that does a full or significant early implementation > and sends comments to the list about it. Even if that comment is "we > found no problems with the spec". It is a huge amount of work to "test" > a spec by implementing it and a valuable contribution to the development. > > If you, or others, see any RAI Area WG drafts that should really > acknowledge an implementation, please bring it to my attention. I > suspect that many people at IETF would feel it is worth saying thanks > for this kind of work, I'd encourage implementors to bring it up with WG > draft editors and Chairs if they think someone should be added to the > Acknowledgements section. > > Thanks, Cullen <RAI AD> > > PS - Thank you for your TURN implementations - as you know, they have > helped find many problems with that spec. I'm off to read the TURN > Acknowledgements :-) My contributions were acknowledged, it's not the issue. The issue, IMO, is that there is not enough early implementations and I was just trying to find a way to improve this. The solution proposed was universally rejected, so the problem is still here. -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Home: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Work: petithug@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf