Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > so the policy you're arguing for is that clients should always randomize?
> 
> When the client has topology information it should follow that (i.e. rules
> 1 - 8). When it doesn't have topology information it should use the order
> it gets from the DNS (i.e. rule 10, and historical practice). This lets
> the client's recursive server do whatever it thinks is sensible with the
> RRset, which is usually round-robin balancing.

i can live with that.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]