Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> so the policy you're arguing for is that clients should always randomize?

When the client has topology information it should follow that (i.e. rules
1 - 8). When it doesn't have topology information it should use the order
it gets from the DNS (i.e. rule 10, and historical practice). This lets
the client's recursive server do whatever it thinks is sensible with the
RRset, which is usually round-robin balancing.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]