Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > only in the case where the server is depending on rr ordering within
> > rrsets, which dns has never guaranteed and which many caches (both rdns
> > and stubs) randomize or reorder anyway, and where the server's
> > imputation of topology knows about every private interconnect that may
> > affect client performance, would RFC 3484 do harm.
> 
> No, it does harm when the servers are depending on RRsets being DISordered.

so the policy you're arguing for is that clients should always randomize?
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]