On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:11:07 -0700 Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:48:07 -0700 > > Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> The point I'm making is that there seems like there should be a > >> way to prevent the covert channel without mucking up TCP's > >> definition of what an endpoint is. > > > > I think this belongs elsewhere than either the secdir list or the > > main IETF list, > > Agreed; I propose to take this over to TSVWG. It's more general than > just TCP... > Don't forget to include SAAG... --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf