-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:48:07 -0700 > Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The point I'm making is that there seems like there should be a way to >> prevent the covert channel without mucking up TCP's definition of what >> an endpoint is. > > I think this belongs elsewhere than either the secdir list or the main > IETF list, Agreed; I propose to take this over to TSVWG. It's more general than just TCP... Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjlcSsACgkQE5f5cImnZrtQJgCfVlcoaA/2rMVhxwWGq5EPDfbP 1F4An25RwJZZRHqcvsUcmzI4CrXG5fQW =4qBz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf