On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:44:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works > > > reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least > > > a hint of merit to your argument. e.g. an actual email address or > > > URL that uses a single-label domain name. > > > > zod:~$ ping hk > > PING hk (203.119.2.28): 56 data bytes > > 64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=183.582 ms > > Sorry. Typo. I mean: > > zod:/auto/boreas/jade/faber$ dig hk > > ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2 <<>> hk > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 34376 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 15, ADDITIONAL: 5 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;hk. IN A > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > hk. 604392 IN A 203.119.2.28 > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > hk. 604392 IN NS ADNS2.BERKELEY.EDU. > hk. 604392 IN NS TLD5.ULTRADNS.INFO. > hk. 604392 IN NS TLD1.ULTRADNS.NET. > hk. 604392 IN NS ADNS1.BERKELEY.EDU. > hk. 604392 IN NS TLD6.ULTRADNS.CO.UK. > hk. 604392 IN NS NS1.HKIRC.NET.hk. > hk. 604392 IN NS B.DNS.TW. > hk. 604392 IN NS NS3.CUHK.EDU.hk. > hk. 604392 IN NS SEC3.APNIC.NET. > hk. 604392 IN NS TLD2.ULTRADNS.NET. > hk. 604392 IN NS TLD3.ULTRADNS.ORG. > hk. 604392 IN NS NS2.CUHK.EDU.hk. > hk. 604392 IN NS NS2.HKIRC.NET.hk. > hk. 604392 IN NS TLD4.ULTRADNS.ORG. > hk. 604392 IN NS NS-HK.RIPE.NET. > > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > TLD4.ULTRADNS.ORG. 36836 IN A 199.7.67.1 > TLD4.ULTRADNS.ORG. 36836 IN AAAA 2001:502:100e::1 > TLD3.ULTRADNS.ORG. 34966 IN A 199.7.66.1 > TLD2.ULTRADNS.NET. 29696 IN A 204.74.113.1 > TLD1.ULTRADNS.NET. 29696 IN A 204.74.112.1 > > ;; Query time: 4 msec > ;; SERVER: 128.9.160.161#53(128.9.160.161) > ;; WHEN: Mon Jul 7 13:43:55 2008 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 508 > > > -- > Ted Faber > http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc > Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG also... % dig version.bind txt chaos @128.9.160.161 ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> version.bind txt chaos @128.9.160.161 ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; version.bind, type = TXT, class = CHAOS ;; ANSWER SECTION: version.bind. 0S CHAOS TXT "9.4.2" ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: version.bind. 0S CHAOS NS version.bind. so - recent resolver code does this trick. ob. "Unexpected attachment on this mail?" - I was actually expecting an attachment that was not there. --bill Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise). _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf