Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works
> > reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least
    ^^^^^^^^
> > a hint of merit to your argument.   e.g. an actual email address or
> > URL that uses a single-label domain name.
> 
> zod:~$ ping hk
> PING hk (203.119.2.28): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=183.582 ms

% ping hk.
PING hk (203.119.2.28) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=265 ms
64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=265 ms

Not very reliably, I think.  :-)

							- Ted
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]