On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works > reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least > a hint of merit to your argument. e.g. an actual email address or > URL that uses a single-label domain name. zod:~$ ping hk PING hk (203.119.2.28): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=183.582 ms 64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=195.586 ms 64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=196.055 ms 64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=3 ttl=243 time=183.091 ms ^C --- hk ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 20.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 183.091/189.578/196.055/6.247 ms zod:~$ whost 203.119.2.28 203.119.2.28 www.hkdnr.hk zod:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf search isi.edu nameserver 128.9.160.161 nameserver 128.9.64.64 -- Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
Attachment:
pgp5w3ge7odJw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf