Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:04:31PM -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:44:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> also...  
> % dig version.bind txt chaos @128.9.160.161
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> version.bind.           0S CHAOS TXT    "9.4.2"
> 
> 	so - recent resolver code does this trick.

Fair enough.  Perils of working for ISI, I suppose - modern
infrastructure.

Not to argue with someone who's forgotten more about DNS than I know,
but I was able to get it to work from zig.usc.edu as well. On zig (a
Linux box talking to an ambiguously identified "USC Bind 9x" server)
ping needed the trailing dot on hk. to work.  And by "got it to work, I
mean "typed ping".  I also had no trouble on a FreeBSD machine talking
to bind 9.3.3.  It works at home, too, but that's also a 9.4.2 bind.

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG

Attachment: pgpnwPwvD84Lu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]