Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/25/2008 4:28 PM, John C Klensin wrote:

--On Thursday, 26 June, 2008 09:41 +1200 Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...
And of course, individual ADs
have to think carefully whether a given issue is or is not
worthy of a DISCUSS, and sometimes they get it wrong. But
that will always be true, however we tune the process and
procedures.

Brian,

While I agree with this, I also believe that there have to be
effective safeguards against bad judgments prevailing for too
long.  And I believe that those have largely slipped away from
us... unless we believe that making changes, unvalidated by WG
or mailing list consensus, simply to get a DISCUSS removed is
the right way to get to "high quality, relevant technical and
engineering documents...".

Indeed that is the issue!

regards,
Lakshminath


    john



_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]