Bernard:
The data is all public. Jari has done a very good job of extracting
the data from the I-D Tracker and making it accessible to
everyone. Of course, any requests for changes to additional graphs
need to go to Jari.
http://www.arkko.com/tools/admeasurements/stat/base.html
Russ
At 11:32 AM 6/24/2008, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> We have a way to count DISCUSS positions, but we do not have a way to
> figure out what percentage of them are perceived as "late surprises"
> by the community. So, while we are taking action in an attempt to
> make things better, we do not have a way to measure our success or
> failure beyond community perception. Suggestions on making this more
> objective and less subjective are greatly appreciated.
>
> Russ
I agree that it might be hard to measure the effect of particular
actions (e.g. changes in
procedures). However, it is *not* hard to measure overall trends in
performance, and
to break these trends down between areas and types of documents.
My understanding is that the Simcoe dataset continues beyond 2001,
and that with some
relatively modest effort, a detailed analysis could be produced
quantifying how the IETF
as performed. This would give us a window into what the actual
results have been.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf