Ned Freed wrote: > I was unable to attend the last three IETFs in person so maybe something has > changed, but at previous meetings my success rate at keeping a wireless > connection going during the plenary hasn't been all that great. This means > IPv6 issues are likely going to be conflated with wireless issues and heaven > knows what else. > My own personal experience at the last two IETFs has been pretty good. Vancouver was rock solid throughout the facility, and during the plenary. There was a single dark spot in Chicago in a particular room. I think the team has really gotten quite good at managing wireless. This, by the way, was a good example of us learning by doing. It took a while for things to get kinked out, but in the end we now know a large wireless room can be done. I imagine the same would be true for IPv6. I think the thing people are struggling with is much more basic: individuals don't get anything by moving to v6. With wireless I got freedom from having to stick a cable here or there. Maybe we should hand out lollipops or something for those who use v6. Eliot _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf