> --On Wednesday, 12 December, 2007 17:05 -0800 Ned Freed > <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I would prefer to have a reference to 2822upd, but I suspect > > this decision dates back to when it wasn't clear that 2822bis > > was going to get updated more or less at the same time. > This is, of course, the sort of thing that can be changed in an > RFC Editor note if, in fact, 2822 is ready and more or less > concurrent. That's what i was hoping you'd say - if 2822upd is ready such a change would be a very good thing IMO. Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf