On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Ned Freed wrote: > > So keep the MUST for aliases but lose it for lists? I could live with that > too but it would probably force a recycle. I thought that removing requirements is OK during document progression. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ PORTLAND PLYMOUTH: SOUTH BACKING SOUTHEAST 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 IN PLYMOUTH. SLIGHT OR MODERATE. FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf