On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:04:54 -0400 Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I'm not sure what your point is -- I took Keith's comment to mean > >> that home NATs with v6 were completely unacceptable. > > > > > > /64's do NOT imply that there's NAT functionality involved, just > > that there's > > a single subnet, yes? > yes, but it's unreasonable to expect a home user to not need to > subnet. particularly when there are so many different media > competing for the home network space....it would be reasonable to > have a subnet for each medium. > > I originally agreed with you on that. However, given modern switches, I'm not nearly as convinced. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf