>> I'm not sure what your point is -- I took Keith's comment to mean that >> home NATs with v6 were completely unacceptable. > > > /64's do NOT imply that there's NAT functionality involved, just that > there's > a single subnet, yes? yes, but it's unreasonable to expect a home user to not need to subnet. particularly when there are so many different media competing for the home network space....it would be reasonable to have a subnet for each medium. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf