Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Aug 17, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:

I'm not sure what your point is -- I took Keith's comment to mean that
home NATs with v6 were completely unacceptable.


/64's do NOT imply that there's NAT functionality involved, just that there's
a single subnet, yes?

Tony

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]