Re: [consensus] comments on draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Bernard" == Bernard Aboba <bernarda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Bernard> O, I definitely think they are session keys.  [BA] They
    Bernard> are not TSKs according to the definition in the EAP Key
    Bernard> Management Framework.

That's true.
But  that definition is not normative for draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt.

    Bernard> Wait, what's wrong with giving 100 authenticators 100
    Bernard> different keys provided that each authenticator is
    Bernard> authorized to claim the identity it plans to claim?
    Bernard> Isn't that exactly the sort of thing we do want to do?
 
    Bernard> [BA] The creation of cryptographically separate keys for
    Bernard> each authenticator is not sufficient; the EAP Key
    Bernard> Management Framework describes the problems that can
    Bernard> result without authentication and authorization.

Again, I think that correctness of accounting in this instance is an
additional requirement the key management framework puts on top of
draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]