>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Hardie <hardie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Ted> At 1:05 PM -0400 3/29/07, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> The problem is that this work is outside the charter of the TLS
>> working group. So, I don't think asking them to take on the
>> document would be appropriate. I also don't think rechartering
>> TLS for this purpose would be appropriate.
Ted> It is actually fairly common for working groups to provide
Ted> advice to the community on work that is related to their
Ted> charter and not on it. If you do not wish to amend the TLS
Ted> charter, you can make a positive evaluation by TLS a
Ted> necessary step before you agree to sponsor this document;
Ted> since that would not make the draft a work product of the
Ted> working group, I don't think that would require a full
Ted> re-charter. A re-charter would allow you, obviously, to move
Ted> change control into the WG and allow competing proposals to
Ted> be put forward. That might be useful at this point, but it
Ted> also doesn't seem required.
Ted, I'd like to do this. However I could use some help figuring out
exactly what question I'm asking the TLS working group to provide
advice on. I guess it could be as simple as "Do you think
draft-housley-tls-authz-extns is worth publishing on the standards
track?"
Would that be the right direction?
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf