Folks, we didn't get a lot of support expressed in the second last call. If I were making a consensus call today I'd say we do not have consensus to publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as a proposed standard given the IPR claims against it. However Russ pointed out to me that it may be that people thought this was a typical last call where silence meant agreement. I think even under that interpretation things look grim: silence means agreement with the prevailing expressed opinion. But to make absolutely sure I propose to conduct a last call to confirm that we don't have consensus to publish as a proposed standard. Does this seem like the right approach to folks? I plan to take some next step within the next couple of days based on input. I'm sorry this issue is taking up so much of the community's time. Sam Hartman Security Area Director _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf