>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Hardie <hardie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Ted> I thought Eric Rescorla and Pasi Eronen had suggested that Ted> this document be evaluated by the TLS working group and the Ted> IPR terms evaluated there. I have that suggestion in an Ted> email thread on the main IETF list, started by Eric and with Ted> the thread title "Last Call Comments on Ted> draft-housley-tls-authz-07". I personally believe that would Ted> be a sensible way forward, as it seems likely that the Ted> working group would be better able to evaluate the impact of Ted> the IPR claims (both RedPhone's and IBM's) than the main IETF Ted> list. The problem is that this work is outside the charter of the TLS working group. So, I don't think asking them to take on the document would be appropriate. I also don't think rechartering TLS for this purpose would be appropriate. If there is a question we can ask that does not involve them taking on responsibility for the technical details of the work then I'd be happy to take that path forward. It's important in writing such a question not to ask them to make a consensus determination about the IPR claims as the IETf doesn't do that, but rather to focus on the document given the IPR claims. I don't know how to do that without asking them to take on the document as a whole. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf