Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





> I can understand that you may be reluctant to dive back in having
> seen the WG formed but I think "not listening" isn't really correct.
> Maybe you meant "didn't listen"?

Even if that's what he really meant, it is not correct.

My recollection is that every issue raised, by anyone, got considered.

There's quite a difference between "not listening" vs. "not agreeing".

d/

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]