Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I can understand that you may be reluctant to dive back in having
seen the WG formed but I think "not listening" isn't really correct.
Maybe you meant "didn't listen"?

Even if that's what he really meant, it is not correct.

My recollection is that every issue raised, by anyone, got considered.

Well, you kept claiming that we couldn't possibly anticipate the ways in which the DKIM protocol would be used, therefore there was no justification for the WG to change DKIM significantly from its original design.

That's not what I would call "consideration". There are lots of things I could call it, none of which are flattering.

Keith


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]