Hi Mike, > Two organizations: IAB and RFC Editor > Two document series: Internet Standards and RFCs > > The RFC Editor through agreement with the IAB and with funding > from the ISOC publishes the Internet Standards series under the > banner of the RFC Series. I'll grant that you have a much longer history in the IETF than I do, but your characerization of the RFC Editor situation doesn't seem to match the various public sources I've been able to find regarding the current status of this work. For instance, the RFC Editor web site says: " 1. The RFC Editor was once Jon Postel; who is it today? The RFC Editor is no longer a single person, it is a small group of people. The Internet Society, on behalf of the IETF, has contracted the RFC Editor function to the Networking Division of the USC Information Sciences Institute (ISI) in Marina del Rey, CA. ISI played a key role in the development of the Internet, and Jon Postel was the Director of ISI'S Networking Division for many years. For an historical account of the RFC series, see "30 Years of RFCs"." If ISOC (on behalf of the IETF) has contracted the RFC Editor function to ISI, then ISOC (on behalf of the IETF) could contract it to someone else. I am not saying that we should. IMO, ISI has been doing an excellent job of fulfilling the RFC Editor role, especially over the last year or so, when they have virtually eliminated the backlogs that had plagued us in the past. The RFC Editor web site also says: "2. Every RFC is attributed to the "Network Working Group". What working group is that? This label in the heading of every RFC is historical in form and symbolic in content. Historically, "network working group" meant the set of researchers who developed the packet switching protocols for the ARPAnet, beginning in 1969. This label is maintained on RFCs as a reminder of the long and significant technical history that is recorded in the RFC series, and as a reminder that today's technical decisions, wise or not, may be with us for many years. Today, the "Network Working Group" should be interpreted as the set of users, vendors, and researchers who are working to improve and extend the Internet, in particular under the ISOC/IETF umbrella." So, it appears that all RFCs are currently published under the ISOC/IETF umbrella. I am not arguing with the history you have presented, but I think that things may have changed since the days when DARPA funded the RFC series. At this point, even the RFC Editor acknowledges that they are publishing all RFCs under the ISOC/IETF umbrella, and that ISI is contracted by ISOC to do so. Margaret _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf