Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 04:09 PM 6/9/2006, Leslie Daigle wrote:

Mike,

Michael StJohns wrote:
At 03:04 PM 6/9/2006, Leslie Daigle wrote:

Mike,

I am not going to engage in a public debate about what constitutes
the complete set of facts here:
I love it when discussions start out with throw away the facts.

That's a mischaracterization of what I said, and I'll accept
an apology.

You said "I'm not going to engage in a public debate about what constitutes the complete set of facts here". Which I took to mean that "What I believe are the facts are indeed the facts and I won't be trying to integrate other views of the facts into my world view nor will I do you the courtesy of trying to understand your point of view on the facts". Perhaps my flippant comment was a mis-characterization and for that I apologize, but it was much milder than I was thinking.

The RFC Editor through agreement with the IAB and with funding from the ISOC publishes the Internet Standards series under the banner of the RFC Series.

No, ISI publishes (all) RFCs under contract from ISOC.

Fact.

This can mean either: "ISOC owns the RFC series and is paying ISI as their agent to publish such a series" or "ISI owns the RFC series and ISOC is paying them to publish additional documents under that imprint".

I believe the latter is correct absent any offer of proof of transfer of rights.


<rest deleted>

You asked for constructive comment. I provided it. You ignored it. Interesting method for gaining consensus.


Leslie.



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]