Lakshminath Dondeti wrote: > I tried this in my secdir review, for instance suggesting that perhaps > PANA-IPsec should be limited to IKEv2 and 4301 and people had > different opinions ranging from 'not sure about forcing IKEv2 on PANA' > to 'there wouldn't be any differentiator to PANA' (they are not > quotes; I am paraphrasing), and so really didn't find a consensus to > make any recommendations. That discussion has still been going on (but I forget if it was in secdir list, with the ADs, or on the PANA list). FWIW, I fully agree that limiting to IKEv2 would be the right choice. --Jari _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf