Re: Kerberos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Narayanan, Vidya wrote:

>
>So, I assume that the issue with using 802.11i/WPA2 would be that it
>requires an upgrade of APs? If EAPoUDP (as being discussed without any
>keys for data traffic protection) were to be used, you would still have
>to perform the MAC address-based access control to provide an equivalent
>level of security as you have now. The only advantage then is the user
>being prompted for a password as opposed to web-based login - perhaps
>that is still a reasonable advantage, I am not sure. 
>  
>
The replacement of web-based logins would indeed be very useful,
because it assumes that web is being used and can be used.
If a voice over IP phone moved from one network to another during
a call, the user would not be pleased if a web login page appeared.
Particularly if the user was in a call or the device had no screen
that can reasonably run web :-) The user would probably be
even less pleased if no login page appeared but packets
stopped flowing.

But its true that non-web-based logins can be achieved in
multiple ways.

--Jari


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]