RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



After some consideration, I can understand how the current text in mankin-pub-req would be discouraging to the technical publisher.

If we changed "refrain from" to "exercise restraint in making" in requirements POSTEDIT-3 and POSTEDIT-4, I assume this would solve Joel and John's concerns.

The question now is if I will get shot from the "keep your grubby hands off my document" crowd.

Stephen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS) [mailto:stephen.hayes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:01 PM
> To: John C Klensin
> Cc: Joel M. Halpern; ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
> 
> 
> John Klensin wrote:
> > Stephen, I routinely complain about too much editing -- if not
> > on every document I submit for RFC publication, at least most of
> > them.   I believe that, in the last couple of years there has
> > been a trend toward more editing that I consider gratuitous,
> > e.g., changing one correct and consistent style to another one.
> > So I may well be the source of some of the complaints you heard.
> > On the other hand, I'm appalled by the editorial and
> > presentation quality of some of the documents that I've seen go
> > to the RFC Editor, even after Last Call and IESG signoff.  
> > 
> > In my opinion, absent something that the document skirts, the
> > "current highly restrictive reading" goes much too far.  Yes, I
> > understand the desire to counterbalance both natural tendencies
> > and some history of over-editing.  But, to the extent to which
> > this document is expected, post-last-call, to form part of the
> > basis for solicitation of people who are interested in doing the
> > job and selection from among those people, and then of a
> > contract with the selected party, I believe it goes _much_ too
> > far: that degree of restrictiveness is simply not what we want
> > or need, IMO.
> 
> Do you have any suggested text?  What I am hearing is 
> something like be frugal in changes except when the document 
> needs it, which IMHO doesn't seem to help.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]