Sam:
We need a way to track the people that have copyright interest. I
had always assumed this was the author list. If we are going to
continue to limit the author count to five people, then there needs
to be a place where the people with copyright interest are listed in
the document. This is the reason that I included the techspec mail
list on my posting.
Russ
At 02:06 PM 5/24/2006, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Russ> I am concerned that the current RFC Editor practice that
Russ> limits the number of authors is in conflict with the IETF
Russ> IPR policies. The RFC Editor currently limits the author
Russ> count to five people. Recent IPR WG discussions make it
Russ> clear to me that authors retain significant copyright.
[There is this concept in US copyright law called a joint work. I'm
ignoring that concept for the moment basically because I don't
understand how it applies to either software or text developed using
an open process. As far as I can tell, no one else understands it
either. Please be aware that this may be a huge gap in my advice.]
So, here we have a conflicting definitions problem.
The author of a work retains the copyright interest. That's true if
if I'm listed as an author or not.
If I write text and do not assign the copyright to someone, I retain
copyright interest in that text.
So the sixth person still owns the copyright interest in the text they
write even if they are not listed.
That means if you have unlisted authors who have contributed
significant chunks of text, you still need to get their clearance to
do anything interesting with that text.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf