Well, obviously, those of us that did the survey should be rewarded
by having the consensus results acted upon ... if people don't like
the results in Montreal, they'll have more of an incentive to take
the survey at that time.
More seriously, Ray might get more of a result if he sent the request
to the list of people that actually attended the Dallas meeting (they
know who we are, after all) rather than just sending it to the ietf list.
Cheers,
Andy
-----------
At 4/26/2006 16:30 -0400, Ed Juskevicius wrote:
Earlier today, Ray suggested that only a small fraction of everyone who
went to Dallas has taken the 10 minutes needed to provide feedback on
the meeting.
I am posting this message to ask "Why so little response?"
Is it because only two hundred people read the IETF discussion list? If
so, then maybe we have all the response we can expect, and should be
happy with it.
If, on the other hand, we know a thousand people monitor the list, then
I return to "Why so little response?"
Are we surveyed-out, or did the survey ask too many questions, or what?
For the record, and for transparency, I did the survey last week. Doing
it was relatively painless, and I don't think it took more than 10
minutes.
Regards,
Ed Juskevicius
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf