Earlier today, Ray suggested that only a small fraction of everyone who went to Dallas has taken the 10 minutes needed to provide feedback on the meeting. I am posting this message to ask "Why so little response?" Is it because only two hundred people read the IETF discussion list? If so, then maybe we have all the response we can expect, and should be happy with it. If, on the other hand, we know a thousand people monitor the list, then I return to "Why so little response?" Are we surveyed-out, or did the survey ask too many questions, or what? For the record, and for transparency, I did the survey last week. Doing it was relatively painless, and I don't think it took more than 10 minutes. Regards, Ed Juskevicius -----Original Message----- From: Ray Pelletier [mailto:rpelletier@xxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 6:48 AM To: ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call All; More than 1,250 of you attended IETF 65 in Dallas and many others attended sessions remotely. Yet only 155 of you have responded to a survey intended to make future meeting experiences more successful. There are only 74 days left before IETF 66 in Montreal, only 74 days during which there may be the opportunity to effect improvements. Again, your participation is anonymous and your candor is most welcome. You can help by taking this short survey at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=649182049947 At the end of the survey you will be able to see the survey results to date. I do appreciate the help. Thanks Ray Pelletier IETF Administrative Director iad@xxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf