Hi,
My apologies, the previous message was sent all too early by mistake...
What I ment to say, you might want to have a look at RFC3316. 3GPP is
using it as a reference for Release 5 (and onwards) cellular hosts. My
personal view is that mobile devices which have IPv6 stack (well, that
is typically dual IPv4/IPv6 stack...) implemented according to it
"implement IPv6".
Best Regards,
Juha W.
> On 4/19/06, Timothy J. Salo <salo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ok, Ok, I probably haven't been paying attention, but...
> >
> > If a device implements a subset of IPv6, (e.g., no IPsec, no mobile
> > IP), is it generally understood that this device "implements IPv6"?
> >
> > Has a standard subset of IPv6 been defined for very low-end devices
> > that simply can't implement a full IPv6?
> >
> > As far as I can tell, we are at least informally moving towards
> > IPv6-over-some-oddball-medium solutions that only implement a subset
> > of IPv6, but it is not clear to me that they are always the same subset.
> > It is also not clear to me whether this matters much.
> >
> > -tjs
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf