Timothy, You might want to have a look at RFC3315. My personal view is that mobile devices implemented according to Best Regards, On 4/19/06, Timothy J. Salo <salo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok, Ok, I probably haven't been paying attention, but... > > If a device implements a subset of IPv6, (e.g., no IPsec, no mobile > IP), is it generally understood that this device "implements IPv6"? > > Has a standard subset of IPv6 been defined for very low-end devices > that simply can't implement a full IPv6? > > As far as I can tell, we are at least informally moving towards > IPv6-over-some-oddball-medium solutions that only implement a subset > of IPv6, but it is not clear to me that they are always the same subset. > It is also not clear to me whether this matters much. > > -tjs > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf