Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:00:44AM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005
> 2.7	1.2	1.6	1.2	2.1	2.4	1.9	2.4	3.4	4.5
> 
> (The numbers represent the number of addresses used up in that year  
> as a percentage of the 3.7 billion total usable IPv4 addresses.)
> 
> Those years where the growth was smaller than the year before never  
> happened twice or more in a row.
> 
> This basically means that unless things take a radical turn, the long- 
> term trend is accelerating growth so that remaining 40% will be gone  
> in less than 9 years. Probably something like 7, as Geoff Huston  
> predicts.
> 

	This is much less time than I have seen in previous reports. If
this is accurate and consistent there is a greater problem than I had
previously thought.
	If that is indeed the case then the "enhanced nat" road for ipv6
begins to make much more sense, even in the nearer term.

	Austin

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]