Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    > From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>

    > even if IP had identifiers for hosts that were independent of
    > locators, they wouldn' t be worth very much without a way to map them
    > to locators. and locators are a lot easier to deal with if they're
    > location-independent.

Huh? Did you mean "identifiers are a lot easier to deal with if they're
location-independent"?

If that wasn't a typo, and you really meant what you said, the whole *point*
of locators is to include location information. A "locator [which is]
location-independent" is an completely oxymoron.

	Noel

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]