Scott Leibrand writes: > NAT (plus CIDR) was the short-term solution, and is realistic as a > medium-term solution. In the long term, though, I don't think it will be > the only solution. It will be if ISPs continue to charge for extra IP addresses, as they probably always will. > And if someday I want to switch to a new ISP who prefers not to give out > IPv4 addresses at all, that'll be fine with me, as long as my ISP provides > me IPv4 translation services to reach that portion of the Internet that is > still IPv4-only at that point. If your ISP charges you extra for more than one IPv6 address, what will you do? _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf