Re: Guidance needed on well known ports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 02:09:47PM -0800,
 Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 163 lines which said:

> The Internet has a signalling layer, the DNS. Applications should
> use it.  The SRV record provides an infinitely extensible mechanism
> for advertising ports.

I agree here but this means we should keep at least one well-known
port, 53.
 
> IANA should be told to close the well known ports
> registry. Applications should use DNS SRV records for service
> location.

I agree with that rule for the *future* protocols. But it does not
help with current (and widely deployed) protocols. So, asking IANA to
refuse new registrations in the well-known ports registry is one
thing, shutting down the registry is another.

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]