RE: Guidance needed on well known ports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@xxxxxxx] 

> And with what port would I reach this magical DNS that would 
> provide the SRV record for the DNS itself?

You use fixed ports for the bootstrap process and only for the bootstrap
process.



> > Fixed ports do not work behind NAT. Anyone who wants to deploy IPv6 
> > would be well advised to pay careful attention to that restriction. 
> > SRV ports work just fine behind a NAT.
> 
> Except that many NATs also intercept DNS requests and 
> redirect them to their own servers, for their own purposes, 
> which can interfere with SRV records (by design).

People who do this are rarely trying to break things. T


> The only thing that works fine behind a NAT is what the NAT 
> vendor wants to work fine. Everything else is up for grabs.

The NAT vendors would like their systems to work as well as possible. If
there had been less hostility to the idea and less determination to ensure
IPv4 actually broke thus forcing deployment of IPv6 this could have worked.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]