Re: Complaints Against The IESG and The RFC-Editor About Publication of RFC-2188 (ESRO)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 01:46:30AM -0800,
 Mohsen BANAN <lists-ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 73 lines which said:

> In general, I consider the garbage that IESG puts in non-IETF RFCs
> as a badge of honor for the author.
> 
> For example, the negative IESG note in the original HTTP specs and
> the success of HTTP demonstrated IESG's attitude and its eventual
> relevance.

It is true that the IESG Notes in RFC 1945 and RFC 1630 are quite
embarassing for the IETF today but you are not Tim Berners-Lee. For
one genius who had trouble being recognized at the beginning, there
are thousands of monkeys-with-keyboards who are rightly ignored.

Your reasoning is the same fallacy as saying "Galileo was persecuted
and he was right, I am persecuted so I am right".


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]