Re: Complaints Against The IESG and The RFC-Editor About Publication of RFC-2188 (ESRO)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:42:50 -0800 (PST), Pyda Srisuresh
<srisuresh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I too agree with Mohsen's comments, overall. What Mohsen points out as true
> eight years ago continues to be true even now. Not a lot changed, IMHO. I
> believe, it had gotten worse. IESG continues to wield enormous influence over
> the independent submissions sent to the RFC editor. The RFC editor needs to be
> independent.

Why?  There are plenty of other publication venues.


		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]