Re: Complaints Against The IESG and The RFC-Editor About Publication of RFC-2188 (ESRO)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 04:56:57 +0100, Harald Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>>>>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:10:10 -0800, Dave Crocker <dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

  Harald> What's the point of reposting this message now?

  Dave> Seems like there ought to be a statute of limitations.

In response to both of you: the point of referring
to eight-year old history is not to disinter the
corpse of the past.

The point is that this history is directly
relevent to a current discussion thread.

I believe I made the point of reposting clear in
the following header:

  Mohsen> [ This is a repost from 6 Nov 1998.
  Mohsen>   In particular the section on:
  Mohsen>      o Separate The RFC Publication Service from the IETF/IESG/IAB.
  Mohsen>   is relevant to the current:
  Mohsen>        STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
  Mohsen>   thread. ]

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]