Re: Beyond China's independent root-servers -- Expanding and Fixing Domain Notation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In the hope of closing a loop, I trust that everyone who has
tried to turn this into a big deal and a huge international
crisis, or has otherwise gotten worked up about it, has seen the
statement in Friday's _People's Daily_.  For those who have not,
I recommend a quick reading of 
http://english.people.com.cn/200603/03/eng20060303_247684.html

It is mercifully short (only four paragraphs) and extremely
clear: the previous report was wrong, '...the content of the
report is severely inconsistent with the facts', 'The only
difference is to add a second level domain ".MIL.CN" in .CN
ccTLD', etc.

There are no "independent root-servers" in China, or at least
none that anyone official is willing to claim.

Next?

     john





_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]