Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Douglas Otis wrote:

> The problem with SPF draft is there is no spf2.0/mfrom.

One week from draft-ietf-marid-mailfrom-00 to the termination
of MARID was a bit short.  And after that the next draft was
again v=spf1 draft-lentczner-spf-00 (same author).  Actually
an emergency draft, because the last real v=spf1 expired at
this time - expecting that MARID creates something better as
far as I was concerned.

The next real thing was draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00 putting
anything that was lost back in, minus some syntax issues found
in MARID, and addressing the processing limit issues.

Whatever you think, but your complaints about the theoretical
upper limit of DNS queries in an attack scenario resulted in
some of the most interesting post-MARID changes (Wayne's I-Ds).

Can't beat CSV of course, but in practice a no-nonsense HELO
policy is now okay, 1 or 2 queries.

                           Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]